Wallpaper: Jane Eyre

I recently watched the new adaptation of Jane Eyre (2011).
The actors were really good 
(and beautiful, too, which doesn't happen in the book, but I liked watching them for two hours). 

I am very critical of book adaptations, and especially so when the book is one of my most favorite ones in the whole world. I happened to be in the middle of one of my rereadings of Jane Eyre, and it didn't help that I kept comparing the movie to the book. 
I didn't approve of it, as was expected, and I had to bang my head a couple of times on the bedpost, which was rather unpleasant.


I found that it had many original phrases from the book, in fact it contained the most faithful phrases I have ever heard on a Jane Eyre adaptation (apart, of course, from the 1983 one).
Also, it focused on Jane and Rochester's relationship, which was nice -I always wish these films wpuld skip the boring parts about her childhood and St. John- although it did not contain a few of my favorite scenes, and, as a result, the romance didn't seem half believable to me. 
All in all, it was better than I had expected it to be, and worse at the same time.

So, I watched it three times almost non-stop, then proceeded to watch the eight or seven other adaptations of Jane Eyre I own, and then watched it again. 
Then, I made a wallpaper.
You can right-click on it, as usual, although if you use it, credit would be nice.

Please let me know if you watched it
and what you think. 
Share on Tumblr


Cathy said...

Jane Eyre is one of my favorite books. I was very excited to see this movie but was a little disappointed. I agree, the actress was a little to pretty for the plain Jane of the book. I loved Jane's kind character and sweet personality in the book but found this movie didn't capture it. Being only 2 hours it also left out so much of the book. It was beautifully made and the acting was good but no comparison to this classic book. I would definitely recommend the book over this movie. :)

Cathy said...

Alexandra - also thanks for following too! Have a wonderful day!

Carla Capshaw said...

Hi Alexandra,

Taking into account that this was a two hour movie, I thought it was really well done. The actors did a great job, imo and I thought the film distilled the romance in a lovely way. The scenery was gorgeous and I think this is the first JE that really gave me the sense of isolation Thornfield has in the book. I especially liked Michael Fassbender as Rochester -- but then I loved him in 300, too, so maybe I just like him. LOL

Like you, I get tired of the childhood scenes and always skip them when watching other versions of the movie that I have. My favorite, favorite verisons have Ciran Hines and Toby Stephens as Mr. R., but I thought Michael F. brought an interesting "behind the eyes" cynicism that I haven't seen in the other actors.

alexandra george said...

Cathy, thanks for your comment. I agree with you, obvisouly, but I always make excuses for flims that are book adaptations, like this one, because I love the fact that they fill my head with images from the book.
They make me dream. And this movie totally did that.
God bless :)

Carla, I can't believe how much I agree with you, I could have written the exact same things in my post... I think we have similar taste in some things, that would explain why I love your books so much also... :) God bless xoxo

Gwendolyn Gage said...

Hi Alexandra! I wanted to let you know that I've awarded you "The Versatile Blogger Award" on my blog, http://gwendolyngage.blogspot.com/ Congratulations!

alexandra george said...

thank you so much Gwendolyn